George Macdonald wrote:
>>I think Microsoft's programming headers all refer to x64 as AMD64, since
>>that was the first one out.
> I'm no expert on .INF files but are you saying that the NTAMD64 is keyed to
> M$ dictated fields for the driver install? This is an Intel-supplied file.
> I got the impression that it was just a comment field here. Either way I
> wouldn't think Intel would be "pleased".
Intel-supplied or not, the platform identifications are all based around
what Microsoft wants to call them (it's their operating system after
all). And I don't think it's really just a comment, it's probably being
used for something. If it is a comment, then likely it's one of those
"commented out" programmatic lines -- something that may have been used
in the past, or something that maybe used in the future, but currently
As for whether Intel will be pleased or not, who reads .INF files?
Yousuf Khan >> Stay informed about: Intel does "AMD64" drivers